dear friends, now have two days I read and reread the many newspapers that back on my absurd judicial history. There is a lot of satisfaction but there is also much bitterness at having to acknowledge that others on the political, judiciary and media have worked for my removal policy. And they did so knowing that I, as the facts are showing, I was wholly innocent. A real shame for which any comment is superfluous. I invite you, then, to review the decision of the investigating judge on the case of Catanzaro Why Not that carry along with the following editorial published today by The reform has taken place (signed by Sergio Soave)
Thank you and see you soon.
COURT OF ORDINARY CATANZARO
Chamber Judge for Preliminary Investigations
Judge Tiziana Macri,
on request to dismiss the proceedings referred to in the inscription borne by Senator Clement MASTELLA to unfounded reports of crime made on 4 March 2008 from the Attorney General's Office (headquarters);
examined acts;
said that for the analytical and comprehensive exposure degi relevant factors in regarding the position of Sen. MASTELLA calling the archive request whose arguments and assessments, fully shared by this court, must be considered herein.
Note:
must establish that: 1) whether there is news of crime, 2) if the same is due to Senator MASTELLA, 3) what is the scope of the evidence obtained and whether they, in a dynamic-evolutionary interpretation of the concept of unfounded, present or not in the capacity expansion to become procedural.
On 14 October 2007, the PM provided the registration of the name of Clemente Mastella under investigation in order offenses p. and p. Articles. 110, 323, 640, para, and 71 cp 195/1974 and subsequent amendments. mod., committed in Calabria, Rome and other parts of the country with conduct in place. Registration
followed a few days the hearing, which occurred on October 11, 2007, Joseph TURSI PRATO, detained for another, which, enforced in July 10, 2007 from a PMDDA, declared, to be aware of facts of public amminastrazione and be available to report the extent known to the PM, then the owner of this proceeding.
On October 11, 2007 TURSI PRATO was heard as a person informed of the facts (see verb. Int, p. 3). The consequential
time between hearing and enrollment suggests that the news of crime must be sought in the declarations referred evaluated in the context of further acquisitions.
It should be noted, indeed, that the requirement to register arises only where the responsibility of one person reveal the existence of specific elements indizianti and not mere suspicion. The term specific elements
indizianti deIl'acquisizion expresses the need of knowledge necessary to outline a story of crime against a person in terms of reasonable certainty.
In this case, Tursi Prato, examining 11 October 2007, refers to an expression of Saladin (see rascr., p. 45) relevant to the position in order to MASTELLA. The overall analysis. highlights of the statements made, however, as showing that lack of specification and unproved the minimum conditions necessary to attach to the words in question indiziante value and listed in paragraphs a) to e) and considerations regarding the demand for storage, p. 13, which is invoked. At the same, therefore, can not assume value indictment against the party called.
This view is confirmed after examining the contents of the statements made by TURSI PRATO before the PM in Rome on October 31, 2007 from the following content: "Do not have detailed knowledge of specific offenses involving the Hon. MASTELLA. I can confirm as stated in the minutes of 11 October this year, Antonio Saladino and the Hon. MASTELLA have been friends for many years and that this fact strengthens the position, only and exclusively in political terms, than the local component of Saladin UDEUR "(see verb. Sint.).
The figure does not appear likely to be dependent on the specific element indiziante Sen. MASTELLA also for the mere registration.
no succor to the original hypothesis blames the previous nor the subsequent acquisitions.
Statements made by MERANT Caterina, la Chimie Joseph, Franz 'Giancarlo and others (see Rich. Arch) can be inferred the existence of confidential relationships between Sen. MASTELLA and Saladin in the attitude and the latter to build and maintain "good relations with everyone" and that even within the political and institutional regardless of party or coalition membership the referent.
there can be evidence to connote illegality of the position of Sen. MASTELLA in those reports confidential.
The same conclusion must arrive in order to conversations picked up on the user of Saladin who as partners that Enza (see request for arch., P. 2 ff.) And a person named Clement (see Rich. Arch, p. 4 et seq., conversations picked up in the proc. No 122/2006 of the Prosecutor's Office at the Court of Lamezia Terme). The dialogues only confirm the existence of confidential relationships between SALADIN and Sen. MASTELLA and their common interest in matters political. As for content
dellla advice GENCO, reference as set forth in the request for storage on pages 7 et seq. Print-on users in use at Sen. MASTELLA, acquired without the consent of the House membership, is unusable.
the merits, however, it only confirms the attendance telephone between SALADIN and Senator already emerged in other ways, but inexpressive "conceivable MASTELLA of conduct as crimes."
investigative analysis of the results obtained makes it quite unnecessary further below.
It follows the findings indicated the acceptance of the request to dismiss against Sen. MASTELLA to unfounded reports of crime.
PQM
Articles beds and applied. 408 et seq. cpp,
in granting the request made by the Attorney General,
• Provides that the proceedings against Sen. el Clemente MASTELLA because the news of crime is unfounded.
• Order the return of documents to the Attorney General's Office (headquarters).
• Email the Clerk to what may be needed.
Catanzaro, April 1, 2008
The judge for preliminary investigations
Tiziana Macri
* * * THE
REFORMIST
Some people with the excuse that should apologize pm Mastella
The news, in newspapers yesterday, was that the investigating judge of Catanzaro has accepted the request of Attorney General , filed the position investigation Mastella De Magistris Why not the prosecutor, and wrote in its order that "absolutely lacked the conditions for the registration of the former keeper under investigation." That is, to want to be generous, that Mastella was the victim of a miscarriage of justice. Mistake but, since we're in Italy and the suspect was the minister of justice, and lasting political consequences now irrevocable. Including a media campaign against Mastella who may have had some weight even in the crisis of the Prodi government, caused by the same Mastella, and therefore in the early dissolution of the chambers.
Well, you know with that title was released yesterday, the unit on a comment by Marco Travaglio, that is one of the most active player in the campaign referred to above? The title read: "And say sorry?". Since it is very rare apology from Labor (unless it must do so because it is to lose one of its countless libel suits, and in fact has recently asked to excuse Antonio Socci), we avidly read the comment, imagining a for those periods journalists that the professional ethics of the Anglo-Saxon press calls "apology." We were wrong. Labor, in addition to completely ignore the filing of the case Mastella, announced in his piece that really soon, after investigation of the mysterious powers of attorney that he attended but for which we poor mortals know nothing, we should all apologize to De Magistris , that the judge who should apologize to Mastella. "A Salerno - he writes - where De Magistris has denounced his superiors for the leak, which were then attributed to him, the investigation would be (our italics) well under way is not far off the day when those who have condemned the CSM should be ashamed and apologize. "
Now De Magistris we will be happy if one day we deserve an apology for an unjust sentence of the CSM. But, meanwhile, could not ask him to excuse Mastella, that such an apology if you already deserve the sentence of gip? And that Labor could not add her? Or the courageous investigative journalism precludes the assessment of the facts can be established to devote himself to the suspect to be ascertained, and the militant journalism has special permission to see the mote in others' eyes but not the beam in your own?
*
BE
the story MASTELLA
Amazing textbook example of malagiustizia
SERGIO SOAVE
Castle accusations that swept Clemente Mastella is falling miserably to decisions of the judiciary itself. The arrests dealt to his wife at the request of a deputy prosecutor to supervise the transfer and approved by a court, while upholding them, declared incompetent on the subject, have been canceled after a few days. The court ruled that ministers of the famous plane trip to Monza State is not a crime. Now it is also recognized that in the not for Mastella Why did not exist even the smallest clues needed to enter the then Keeper of the list of suspects. This means that Mastella had every reason to send inspectors to check correctness (later judged inadequate in the Council of the Judiciary) of the Luigi De Magistris. On the other hand the thread that tied Mastella investigation of (suspected) fraud against the EU was very thin: his phone number found on the agenda of a suspect, who had also pursued the representation of a social organization , of course, held contacts with politicians. On a track was built so evanescent that today we can rightly define a judicial persecution, immensely enhanced by the persistent pillory television and a relentless media campaign. The political consequences were enormous, the Minister I had to resign for Justice, not having received political solidarity calling (replaced by a greedy and far from unanimous recognition of "human") has left the majority, putting the seal on a crisis already evident. Mastella and his party, as a result of the campaign that it is hard to call information made on the judiciary proved to be unfounded, are now, on the eve of polling day, the untouchables. For coalitions and parties, apparently with the Udeur, depicted as the epitome of bad politics, it was considered a risk by not running, so a real presence, limited to a specific land area, has been canceled from the competition. This is a textbook example of malagiustizia malainformazione and that should make us reflect on the need to limit non-independence of the judiciary and freedom of press, but you do abuse these rights, to turn them into tools to offend the dignity of people and create serious disruption to the democratic political life. At least that compensation is due to Mastella, so that what he has unjustly suffered a recurrence and to make policy choices in deciding both the free play of forces, the consensus that get the results that follow, judged with a meter is not falsified by non-elected powers used in a reckless and malicious.
0 comments:
Post a Comment