11 Dpo With Weird Smelling Cm?

A two three ... Stella

Gianluigi Stella, well-known journalist of the Corriere della Sera, is the witty moralist on me because I would have gone on leave so many years ago by Rai making me pay taxes for the board as a journalist despite having been elected to Parliament. The charge is based on ignorance and lack of knowledge of constitutional facts. Strange for a journalist is not it? It's like this: I did not choose the expectation paid by the State. You could not do otherwise. At that time paid the Rai. The mechanism was valid for all employees, journalists and not a public institution. He, too, if it were elected today, could not practice and should be on leave. From 1998 onwards, until you get to retirement, the contributions I've paid them directly, for almost ten years. But the story is even more curious is the whole story: When I was elected twice as many parliamentary work place, since nothing required a choice. I immediately put my hand on voluntary leave. Rather then passed to fool me and my colleagues said, "but why did you do that?". Then turned a 'question to the then Speaker of the House, Ingrao, which basically said that all the other MPs from different parties were doing double duty and that the DC so insulted, on that, but he behaved properly from the point of view of ethics. An uproar broke out. The question was not accepted, the office said, because it made reference to some colleagues, but Rai in the air became stifling. Rejoined the Board and the story is exaggerated to the point that all the colleagues-journalists looked at me wrong for months. Then, after some time, the decision was made that the expectation was mandatory for elected automatically. So Stella
wrong. But for judges who are on board voluntarily even before the scandal but there fifty years if they take the early retirement while the salary from Parliament. The authors of the Casta know who you are. If it had affected me all would happen. It does not affect me ... and therefore not talked about. I just hope that in the second edition of the book can be told for certain things as they are, and not as people think they are.